Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Adreno 750 GPU Rumored To See A 14.7 Percent Frequency Downgrade, Qualcomm Likely Targeting Better Efficiency - wccftechWelp_im_damned@lemdro.id to Android@lemdro.id – 72 points – 9 months agowccftech.com6Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsA wise choice tbh. Phones are already become fast enough to be enjoyable several years ago. i pay 1k to browse instagram so I dont care about its perfomance surprisingly this is how people defend the new pixel 8 pro. $999 for mid-range performance? "Well I don't play games anyway so it's fine"Nice let them gaslight themselves I need those suckers to keep competition aliveHow is any of that untrue? The pixels do a lot of things that no other phones do, why should the average phone user care about peak performance?because it costs $999. it only does what a <$500 phone can do, the the only reason pixels can "do what no other phones do" is not capability but artificial restrictions.
A wise choice tbh. Phones are already become fast enough to be enjoyable several years ago. i pay 1k to browse instagram so I dont care about its perfomance surprisingly this is how people defend the new pixel 8 pro. $999 for mid-range performance? "Well I don't play games anyway so it's fine"Nice let them gaslight themselves I need those suckers to keep competition aliveHow is any of that untrue? The pixels do a lot of things that no other phones do, why should the average phone user care about peak performance?because it costs $999. it only does what a <$500 phone can do, the the only reason pixels can "do what no other phones do" is not capability but artificial restrictions.
i pay 1k to browse instagram so I dont care about its perfomance surprisingly this is how people defend the new pixel 8 pro. $999 for mid-range performance? "Well I don't play games anyway so it's fine"Nice let them gaslight themselves I need those suckers to keep competition aliveHow is any of that untrue? The pixels do a lot of things that no other phones do, why should the average phone user care about peak performance?because it costs $999. it only does what a <$500 phone can do, the the only reason pixels can "do what no other phones do" is not capability but artificial restrictions.
surprisingly this is how people defend the new pixel 8 pro. $999 for mid-range performance? "Well I don't play games anyway so it's fine"Nice let them gaslight themselves I need those suckers to keep competition aliveHow is any of that untrue? The pixels do a lot of things that no other phones do, why should the average phone user care about peak performance?because it costs $999. it only does what a <$500 phone can do, the the only reason pixels can "do what no other phones do" is not capability but artificial restrictions.
How is any of that untrue? The pixels do a lot of things that no other phones do, why should the average phone user care about peak performance?because it costs $999. it only does what a <$500 phone can do, the the only reason pixels can "do what no other phones do" is not capability but artificial restrictions.
because it costs $999. it only does what a <$500 phone can do, the the only reason pixels can "do what no other phones do" is not capability but artificial restrictions.
A wise choice tbh. Phones are already become fast enough to be enjoyable several years ago.
surprisingly this is how people defend the new pixel 8 pro.
$999 for mid-range performance? "Well I don't play games anyway so it's fine"
Nice let them gaslight themselves I need those suckers to keep competition alive
How is any of that untrue? The pixels do a lot of things that no other phones do, why should the average phone user care about peak performance?
because it costs $999.
it only does what a <$500 phone can do, the the only reason pixels can "do what no other phones do" is not capability but artificial restrictions.