Apple exec defends 8GB $1,599 MacBook Pro, claims it's like 16GB on a PC

Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@beehaw.org – 280 points –
Apple exec: Macs are so efficient 8GB equals 16GB on a PC
theregister.com
164

You are viewing a single comment

In my entirely anecdotal experience, MacOS is significantly better at RAM management than Windows. But it's still a $1,600 USD computer, and 16GB of RAM costs nearly nothing, it's just classic Apple greed.

I'm also under the impression the M powered books are much better at thermo management and battery usage over PC versions?

ARM chips are generally better at that.

Really hoping Snapdragon Oryon can be the same boon for Windows/Linux that Apple's M CPUs were for Mac

How did you measure this?

The main metric has been with Adobe apps. 2017 Macs with 8GB of RAM are still able to run Premiere and a few others things smoothly simultaneously. Windows machines with the same config were crashing constantly and kept going.

But I'm still not defending Apple here. It's been 6 years, and their base level MacBook still ships with the same amount of RAM.

It’s not anecdotal in the least. It’s been widely tested. There’s a reason an M1 Mac mini with 8GB of RAM can load and fully support over 100 tracks in Logic Pro. The previous Intel machines would buckle with just a few.

ARM is not comparable to x86-64. The former is totally unified, the latter totally modular.

I can load even more tracks with 0 RAM on Windows.

Just one big page file.