Commentary: We face a world potentially running out of antibiotics

Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@beehaw.org – 74 points –
Commentary: We face a world potentially running out of antibiotics
channelnewsasia.com
77

You are viewing a single comment

Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser.

Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote.

Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water.

I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water.

that has never happened.

Exactly. Thats the problem.

Global consumption and production are increasing

Do. You. Follow?

you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all.

You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it.

Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term.

Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down.

Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore.

Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive.

Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down.

that's not causal.

Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world.

i never said that.

Funny how that works isn't it

strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty.

I wholeheartedly agree.

when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users.

1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...

Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term.

that's true. what you said before was not.

1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...