again, it's a matter of interpretation. you making excuses for it would look bad if the prevailing opinion matched mine.
Facts are facts. She was not a political opponent because she did not get enough support to even participate in the debate. She was arrested for breaking the law, not for being a political opponent
she was a political opponent. she opposed them politically and challenged them for election.
She challenged them the same way a fly challenges an F-16.
this is just rhetorical posturing. she had opposing political positions and was denied a platform with others vying for the same seat.
Denied because she had insufficient support to qualify. That's a requirement in every democracy on the planet to be considered a serious candidate.
Denied because she had insufficient support to qualify.
those requirements are arbitrary.
the United States isn't a democracy
It's a representative democracy. If we can't agree on at least this, then your opinions are not grounded in reality and there is no point talking further.
it's a fascist oligarchy with the trappings of a representative democracy.
So there is no point in talking further. Your views are not based in fact or reality.
we are working with the same facts. it's been a matter of interpretation this whole time.
You decided on your interpretation regardless of the facts. I am not going to continue a discussion with a dishonest person who cannot admit to plain fact.
your accusation of dishonesty is, itself, intellectually dishonest.
again, it's a matter of interpretation. you making excuses for it would look bad if the prevailing opinion matched mine.
Facts are facts. She was not a political opponent because she did not get enough support to even participate in the debate. She was arrested for breaking the law, not for being a political opponent
she was a political opponent. she opposed them politically and challenged them for election.
She challenged them the same way a fly challenges an F-16.
this is just rhetorical posturing. she had opposing political positions and was denied a platform with others vying for the same seat.
Denied because she had insufficient support to qualify. That's a requirement in every democracy on the planet to be considered a serious candidate.
those requirements are arbitrary.
the United States isn't a democracy
It's a representative democracy. If we can't agree on at least this, then your opinions are not grounded in reality and there is no point talking further.
it's a fascist oligarchy with the trappings of a representative democracy.
So there is no point in talking further. Your views are not based in fact or reality.
we are working with the same facts. it's been a matter of interpretation this whole time.
You decided on your interpretation regardless of the facts. I am not going to continue a discussion with a dishonest person who cannot admit to plain fact.
your accusation of dishonesty is, itself, intellectually dishonest.