Epic explains why it hasn't sued Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft over 30% fee

Goronmon@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.world – 166 points –
Epic explains why it hasn't sued Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft over 30% fee | Epic vs Google
gamesindustry.biz
41

You are viewing a single comment

I'll happily pay these 30% if it means I get quality services for them:

  • high speed download servers
  • reliable cloud saves
  • automatic, non intrusive updates
  • discussion forums
  • easy mod management
  • friend networking, multiplayer services
  • responsive and uncomplicated support

(using Steam as an example here)

People always act like those are to be taken as granted, but if you have ever worked in dev/devops, you would know that there's a lot of work maintaining each one of them.

Also, you can use these services for as long as you want, despite paying for them with a single one-time purchase.

Of course, if the platform doesn't provide any services or benefits, your point stands. In that case just avoid it.

Responsive support? On Steam?

Apart from the forums, Epic offer all those things and take only 12%. Microsoft offer most of those things and also take 12%.

Hosting a forums platform costs almost nothing. Moderating them like Valve, expecting the game creators to do the work and doing an extremely poor job, with each big game hub filled with toxicity and people earning points for racism and other forms of bigotry, is certainly not worth 18%.

1 more...
1 more...