Israeli military says its troops shot and killed three hostages by mistake

TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.world – 320 points –
Israeli military says its troops shot and killed three hostages by mistake
theguardian.com

TheGuardian.com

108

You are viewing a single comment

Yeah, I'm not going to disagree with the condemnation of the terrorist attack. That said, Israel has been, objectively, committing war crimes for decades now unpunished.

Two wrongs don't make a right, not justifying just explaining, and all that.

Before Oct. all the apartheid collective punishment was absolutely war crimes, and I'd love to see Bibi and many Likud members at the ICC for their crimes. They can still argue that Gaza was an operational location for Hamas, but I think and hope they'd lose that argument.

But after October... Hamas officially made Gaza a theater of war and any target they co-locate in loses legal protections. And when I see 57% resident support for Hamas there (their elected governement), I steuggle and mostly feel awful for the 43% who don't support them.

I am with you that two wrongs don't make a right. Or in this region's case, an endless cycle of thousands of years of violence don't make a right.

But I also believe strongly that Israel has a right to defend itself. The current mess is Hamas's design. I don't know what people want Israel to do, take the terrorist attack that killed 1200+... just take it on the chin and go "oh well"? When any honest person knows no nation on earth would do that.

Take my upvote, a rare one on the worldnews group.

Fully agree Israel has a right to defend itself but what it seems to be doing now is more akin to invasive eradication than defense. They are on the offensive. Why does 1.2K dead in Israel justify 18K dead, hospitals targeted and destroyed, and a forced emigration of citizens in Gaza?

If a terrorist organization ruled the US I'm sure more than half the country would vote in support either out of blind nationalism or fear. Putin's got >90% support, eh? I don't think it's fair to say any recent election in Gaza is unbiased. It would also seem not so unreasonable that to the people of Gaza, Hamas looks more friendly than Israel recently.

Because when Hamas co-locates out of them they lose protected status.

If Hamas looks friendly to you, I desperately urge you to research some history outside of your bubble. I'm floored.

If you replace every occurrence of hamas with nethanyahu your comments makes half sense

I don't see a difference between Bibi and his partner Hamas. Never have. And I hate Likud.

The main difference is the power dynamic. One of those groups has all of the power, including the backing of the US military, while the other is a reaction to oppression.

Only one of those two parties has the power to end all of this right now.

Take my upvote, a rare one on the worldnews group.

After reading past your first paragraph, I'm not sure I want it from you.

Hamas is a reaction to the mess, not its "designer."

Said every apologist for terroism and terrorists.

Yes, terrorism is one potential reaction/outcome of brutal occupation and oppression. There is a difference between explaining something and condoning it.