TikTok requires users to “forever waive” rights to sue over past harms | TikTok may be seeking to avoid increasingly high costs of mass arbitration.
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7c668ec0-a3ad-455f-b736-1f5f13808b09.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
![TikTok requires users to “forever waive” rights to sue over past harms](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/022827af-dab5-4806-9f59-108f1722977f.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
arstechnica.com
TikTok requires users to “forever waive” rights to sue over past harms | TikTok may be seeking to avoid increasingly high costs of mass arbitration.::TikTok may be seeking to avoid increasingly high costs of mass arbitration.
You are viewing a single comment
Last living monarch of ... Just in general?
A contract related to Disney in Florida wanted a forever, couldn't legally do it, but you could do a timeframe from a person, so they picked the last British monarch after a certain birth cutoff, essentially giving them something like 300 years (very rough estimate don't remember well enough) in a contract that wasn't intended to really do more than 100.
Its crazy they could do that in america
So it's still possible. Didn't you have a big kerfuffle in 1775 about basing your legal system on a British monarch