Gavin Newsom doesn’t want to remove Trump from California ballotreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world – 129 points – 10 months agoindependent.co.uk55Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentNo way this supreme court upholds that ruling. Which pisses me off even more that Biden refused to stack the court when he had the chanceYes I fear it is just misleading hope. Another thread is hoping Dean Phillips can upset a repeat of 2020 Biden v Trump. Who knows, we'll see. At least Breyer was replaced by Jackson. The Senate is as much to blame as well.It would take an act of Congress to alter the Judicial Act of 1969, which sets the current size of the Supreme Court. Democrats consider the preservation of the filibuster to be more important.
No way this supreme court upholds that ruling. Which pisses me off even more that Biden refused to stack the court when he had the chanceYes I fear it is just misleading hope. Another thread is hoping Dean Phillips can upset a repeat of 2020 Biden v Trump. Who knows, we'll see. At least Breyer was replaced by Jackson. The Senate is as much to blame as well.It would take an act of Congress to alter the Judicial Act of 1969, which sets the current size of the Supreme Court. Democrats consider the preservation of the filibuster to be more important.
Yes I fear it is just misleading hope. Another thread is hoping Dean Phillips can upset a repeat of 2020 Biden v Trump. Who knows, we'll see. At least Breyer was replaced by Jackson. The Senate is as much to blame as well.
It would take an act of Congress to alter the Judicial Act of 1969, which sets the current size of the Supreme Court. Democrats consider the preservation of the filibuster to be more important.
No way this supreme court upholds that ruling. Which pisses me off even more that Biden refused to stack the court when he had the chance
Yes I fear it is just misleading hope. Another thread is hoping Dean Phillips can upset a repeat of 2020 Biden v Trump. Who knows, we'll see.
At least Breyer was replaced by Jackson. The Senate is as much to blame as well.
It would take an act of Congress to alter the Judicial Act of 1969, which sets the current size of the Supreme Court.
Democrats consider the preservation of the filibuster to be more important.