The C++ scope resolution operator is beautiful
Both zig and go use the dot operator, but I find the '::' operator much more readable.
Vec::new();
Makes it clear that were accessing a static method belonging to the Vec struct/namespace.
Vec.new()
Makes it seem like Vec is an object with a 'new' method.
Am I alone in thinking this?
You are viewing a single comment
That's just convention.
:: is enforced by the compiler.
Yeah, but does that matter? I don't think, I've ever accidentally broken these conventions, where compiler assistance would have been helpful.
It don't get past review if it doesn't follow standards. I'm yet to see a deviation.
If a language is bad because devs do stupid things, they're all bad.