The world shouldn't have to pay because your parents sucked at their job and fucked you up, bro.
Ah you're right, my parents should have known about the dangers of porn in 1997. I'm also not fucked up, just feel as if I'd have been better without
Do... Do you think porn was a new-fangled thing in 1997?
No lol, but the Internet was
You're a grown-ass human being projecting your problems into the entirety of human society. That's pretty fucked up from where I stand.
Damn dude, sorry I knocked your hobby, don't take it too personally
So you're over here agreeing with someone who literally said they would walk into every home to confiscate anything that may allow access to porn if they could, but me calling you out for being a fascist shithead is just me taking it personally? Okay, yeah, sure buddy.
Well sorry man, you just seem to be getting bothered. I wanted some discussion since porn is kind of a problem for young kids these days. I don't think confiscating things is logical, I just think there should be stronger controls online, maybe closer to Japan. they make you login to your Google account to verify your age before showing search results with any porn. What they don't do is connect information on everyone entering every site... Obviously this isn't what North Carolina is doing, but I figured this was a forum where discussion was allowed. But i guess in the US you're either a hard-line liberal or hard-line conservative. Where my hard-line moderates at?
You willfully associate yourself with an extremist in public, and I'm in the wrong for assuming you're also an extremist? Lol. Lmao even.
Hmmm.. I still agree with their original comment "it's not fascist to try and stop kids from accessing porn".
I see that as pretty broad, and not necessarily indicating they want to collect information on people.
Wanting to stop kids from accessing porn? Not fascist.
Wanting to do it using force and/or violence? Fascist.
Wilfully ignoring the context because it doesn't suit your argument right now? Scummy.
What comment of his was encouraging violence? I'm sorry, maybe I'm an airhead, but I didn't get that context from him.
The world shouldn't have to pay because your parents sucked at their job and fucked you up, bro.
Ah you're right, my parents should have known about the dangers of porn in 1997. I'm also not fucked up, just feel as if I'd have been better without
Do... Do you think porn was a new-fangled thing in 1997?
No lol, but the Internet was
You're a grown-ass human being projecting your problems into the entirety of human society. That's pretty fucked up from where I stand.
Damn dude, sorry I knocked your hobby, don't take it too personally
So you're over here agreeing with someone who literally said they would walk into every home to confiscate anything that may allow access to porn if they could, but me calling you out for being a fascist shithead is just me taking it personally? Okay, yeah, sure buddy.
Well sorry man, you just seem to be getting bothered. I wanted some discussion since porn is kind of a problem for young kids these days. I don't think confiscating things is logical, I just think there should be stronger controls online, maybe closer to Japan. they make you login to your Google account to verify your age before showing search results with any porn. What they don't do is connect information on everyone entering every site... Obviously this isn't what North Carolina is doing, but I figured this was a forum where discussion was allowed. But i guess in the US you're either a hard-line liberal or hard-line conservative. Where my hard-line moderates at?
You willfully associate yourself with an extremist in public, and I'm in the wrong for assuming you're also an extremist? Lol. Lmao even.
Hmmm.. I still agree with their original comment "it's not fascist to try and stop kids from accessing porn".
I see that as pretty broad, and not necessarily indicating they want to collect information on people.
Wanting to stop kids from accessing porn? Not fascist.
Wanting to do it using force and/or violence? Fascist.
Wilfully ignoring the context because it doesn't suit your argument right now? Scummy.
What comment of his was encouraging violence? I'm sorry, maybe I'm an airhead, but I didn't get that context from him.
Wishing to go into people's homes and forcefully enforce your opinions on them is inherently violent.
Oh you're right, I guess I interpreted that as an exaggeration