Is no one else looking at this line the school district is at this point just pulling every possible book that could match the description of the law in purpose to make a point?
One teacher made a complaint about a couple of books so they said fine, well just remove everything else that this bill could possibly touch. Just to prove how ambiguous and far stretching this law can go?
Of course they shouldn't pull a dictionary but it matches the description. This is to test the law.
Pulling the dictionary accomplishes what they want: a dumber future generation.
Pull the Bible, that's what riles them up
In Florida you misspelled 'dummer'. You can only sound out the words now.
Is no one else looking at this line the school district is at this point just pulling every possible book that could match the description of the law in purpose to make a point?
One teacher made a complaint about a couple of books so they said fine, well just remove everything else that this bill could possibly touch. Just to prove how ambiguous and far stretching this law can go?
Of course they shouldn't pull a dictionary but it matches the description. This is to test the law.
Pulling the dictionary accomplishes what they want: a dumber future generation.
Pull the Bible, that's what riles them up
In Florida you misspelled 'dummer'. You can only sound out the words now.
What's that extra m for?
The did that too, and conservative figures books.
Article lays it all out pretty well