Nightshade, the free tool that ‘poisons’ AI models, is now available for artists to useLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.world – 762 points – 5 months agoventurebeat.com259Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent comment As an artist I want to be able to tell where my work is used and where not. that would be nice. a government-enforced monopoly isnt an ethical vehicle to achieve your goal.I'm open for other ideas, until then I take laws. I don't see anything wrong with people making rules for interactions. rules are ok. laws are unjust.Rules that are not enforced don't make any sense whatsoever.wrongYou are master debater sir, difficult to disagree with such eloquent and well thought out argumentation.I presented exactly as much support for my position as you for yoursI thought It was rather self-explanatory, but sure you need me to explain why rules make only sense if they are enforced?they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
As an artist I want to be able to tell where my work is used and where not. that would be nice. a government-enforced monopoly isnt an ethical vehicle to achieve your goal.I'm open for other ideas, until then I take laws. I don't see anything wrong with people making rules for interactions. rules are ok. laws are unjust.Rules that are not enforced don't make any sense whatsoever.wrongYou are master debater sir, difficult to disagree with such eloquent and well thought out argumentation.I presented exactly as much support for my position as you for yoursI thought It was rather self-explanatory, but sure you need me to explain why rules make only sense if they are enforced?they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
I'm open for other ideas, until then I take laws. I don't see anything wrong with people making rules for interactions. rules are ok. laws are unjust.Rules that are not enforced don't make any sense whatsoever.wrongYou are master debater sir, difficult to disagree with such eloquent and well thought out argumentation.I presented exactly as much support for my position as you for yoursI thought It was rather self-explanatory, but sure you need me to explain why rules make only sense if they are enforced?they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
rules are ok. laws are unjust.Rules that are not enforced don't make any sense whatsoever.wrongYou are master debater sir, difficult to disagree with such eloquent and well thought out argumentation.I presented exactly as much support for my position as you for yoursI thought It was rather self-explanatory, but sure you need me to explain why rules make only sense if they are enforced?they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
Rules that are not enforced don't make any sense whatsoever.wrongYou are master debater sir, difficult to disagree with such eloquent and well thought out argumentation.I presented exactly as much support for my position as you for yoursI thought It was rather self-explanatory, but sure you need me to explain why rules make only sense if they are enforced?they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
wrongYou are master debater sir, difficult to disagree with such eloquent and well thought out argumentation.I presented exactly as much support for my position as you for yoursI thought It was rather self-explanatory, but sure you need me to explain why rules make only sense if they are enforced?they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
You are master debater sir, difficult to disagree with such eloquent and well thought out argumentation.I presented exactly as much support for my position as you for yoursI thought It was rather self-explanatory, but sure you need me to explain why rules make only sense if they are enforced?they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
I presented exactly as much support for my position as you for yoursI thought It was rather self-explanatory, but sure you need me to explain why rules make only sense if they are enforced?they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
I thought It was rather self-explanatory, but sure you need me to explain why rules make only sense if they are enforced?they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.
that would be nice. a government-enforced monopoly isnt an ethical vehicle to achieve your goal.
I'm open for other ideas, until then I take laws. I don't see anything wrong with people making rules for interactions.
rules are ok. laws are unjust.
Rules that are not enforced don't make any sense whatsoever.
wrong
You are master debater sir, difficult to disagree with such eloquent and well thought out argumentation.
I presented exactly as much support for my position as you for yours
I thought It was rather self-explanatory, but sure you need me to explain why rules make only sense if they are enforced?
they don't, so any explanation is erroneous.
Just curious, why do you communicate with other if you are not interested in their opinion?
I said what I wanted to say. I didn't ask for your opinion.