Kenneth Smith ‘struggled for life’ for 22 minutes in Alabama nitrogen gas execution: Updates

some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to News@lemmy.world – 708 points –
Kenneth Smith ‘struggled for life’ for 22 minutes in nitrogen gas execution: Updates
independent.co.uk

“Kenny just began to gasp for air repeatedly and the execution took about 25 minutes total.”

Pretty compassionate way to kill a person.

Once again, the Law in the south is brutal.

548

You are viewing a single comment

It's humane when done properly, this one sounds botched. Which was probably the point, given that cruelty is part of the death sentence system.

If the person is aware it is happening it can't be humane because they can hold their breath and will still get the effects of suffocation. Plus the whole awareness of being killed.

Oxygen deprivation won't kill you fast enough to not notice what is going on if you know it is going to happen.

That's the point of using nitrogen though. If you replace all the breathable air around a person, they're not going to notice anything is wrong. The pain and distress mostly comes from suffocation and suffocation comes from excess CO2 in the lungs and body. If there is no gaseous exchange in the lungs, there will be no suffocation, you just pass out and eventually die of hypoxia.
Nitrogen is used in Switzerland for assisted suicide, you go in a sealed pod, and at the press of a button all air is replaced by nitrogen and you die.

If the person knows they are in a chamber to be put to death and they want to live then they will know something is wrong and will try to hold their breath.

Mask or room are not stressful if the person does want to die or doesn't know what is going on. You have to breathe willingly for the process to work without stress.

So don't let them know the exact moment that the nitrogen is coming.

Look, I hate the death penalty and I think it should never be used. But if it's going to be done and there's no way I can stop that, I can at least recognize that there are ways it could be done that are relatively humane. Nitrogen gas asphyxiation is relatively humane, but as always with the caveat that you don't hopelessly botch the attempt.

These Alabama yahoos seem to be fundamentally incapable of not botching their execution attempts.

Executions have specific steps that include setting a time and place that cannot be bypassed for surprise. Don't forget that it is a common practice for a person of faith to be present, and it isn't like you can spring something on them too and there is no reason that they would need to keep the surprise a secret.

How about we just stop killing people? He was in jail for decades already, what did making him suffer a terrible death accomplish?

Executions have specific steps that include setting a time and place that cannot be bypassed for surprise.

So change that step. Why is that particular step impossible to alter? You're making up rules specifically to make the execution more traumatic.

How about we just stop killing people?

That would of course be the ideal outcome. But the problem is that many jurisdictions, such as Alabama, are insistent on it. So if they're going to do it and we can't stop them from doing it, why not at least try to get them to do it in a humane manner?

All of my advice to Alamaba would be prefaced with "you shouldn't kill this guy at all, but if I can't stop you, then you should at least..." And nitrogen gas asphyxiation is definitely near the top of my "you should at least..." suggestions. As long as you do it right. The victim having sufficient forewarning to hold his breath is doing it wrong.

So change that step. Why is that particular step impossible to alter?

First off, the date and time of the execution is scheduled ahead of time. A random time to execute is even more cruel than a set time because it means the person is just waiting for something to happen. It also fucks with any kind of support for the person dying and any tracking of the steps taken to ensure it is done properly.

You're making up rules specifically to make the execution more traumatic.

No, you are suggesting making changes that would be impossible or at least harder to implement than just not executing people.

A real solution would be to administer an injection that knocks him out and then turn on the nitrogen so he would be asleep when it started. But that requires a trained medical professional, and if that was a possibility they wouldn't have fucked up trying to kill him with lethal injection in 2022.

Stop buying the state propaganda to justify executions when they keep fucking it up. You are the one promoting suffering.

I'm not talking about randomizing the date. I'm talking about randomizing the exact second when the switch is thrown. Executions aren't timed to the second. And even if they were, change that. Again, there isn't some kind of immutable law of physics at work here. The rules are all made up. If the goal is to execute someone humanely and the rules are preventing that, then change the rules.

Did you know, for example, that in Japan a prisoner who has been sentenced to death will only be informed that "today's the day" on the morning of the day the execution is to take place? And that his family and the general public aren't informed until after it has been done? As I said, these things are not laws of physics.

No, you are suggesting making changes that would be impossible or at least harder to implement than just not executing people.

Really. You think it's hard to not tell a guy when you're about to turn a valve?

A real solution would be to administer an injection that knocks him out

You know what also "knocks him out"? Anoxia.

Also, the whole reason this mess happened in the first place is because Alabama previously spent five hours trying and failing to give this guy a lethal injection. Your idea of being more humane is to go back to the method that they even more flagrantly and horrifyingly botched in the first place.

Stop buying the state propaganda to justify executions

When have I ever said that an execution was justified? Go ahead and comb through my comment history on this subject, it feels like every second comment of mine has included the disclaimer that I disapprove of the death penalty and don't think it should ever be applied.

The point of this argument is to advocate for the most humane approach if you're going to execute someone anyway. If I can't stop it, then I at least want it to be done humanely.

There's a saying that I wish was more common, "don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good." The perfect solution to all this would be to never execute anyone. But that's apparently not going to happen in the near future, certainly not in Alabama, and so we're left hoping for the "good" outcome rather than the "perfect" one.

You are the one promoting suffering.

Exactly 100% not true.