‘Seismic shift’: driving unaffordable for many in US amid push toward SUVs

dantheclamman@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 397 points –
‘Seismic shift’: driving unaffordable for many in US amid push toward SUVs
theguardian.com
160

You are viewing a single comment

Non-tank sized vans are available and have better aerodynamics and overall utility than a truck.

Those are called hatchbacks and are pretty awesome! Unfortunately the Civic hatchback I had for 15 years would have been better for the last 5 years I owned it if the hatch area was just a bed becauseI no longer needed a back seat but would have been 10x more convenient with an open bed in the fact same space instead of being enclosed.

They may have better coefficient of friction, but vans have a high frontal cross section. That tends to cancel out that advantage.

We rented a minivan on a recent trip and got 35+ mpg with a very full load, and it had some decent get up and go. It had a long sloped front end and I would absolutely recommend minivans to anyone who needs more space than a hatchback!

It wouldn't work for me outside that situation though, which is why I keep saying no to those suggestions.

Was that a hybrid? I'm having trouble finding a minivan that gets that kind of mpg that isn't a hybrid. Conversely, a hybrid crossover will easily break 40mpg for both city and highway. It weighs around the same while having better aerodynamics.

To be clear, aerodynamics dominates on the highway, and weight dominates in cities.