"We're nowhere near the point where an AI can do your job, but we're well past the point where your boss can be suckered into firing you and replacing you with a bot that fails at doing your job." (Plmozz@mbin.grits.dev to Technology@beehaw.org – 256 points – 10 months agopluralistic.net64Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentHe has literal examples of head count increasing due to this use of ai, he's not the idiot here.Anecdote are not statistics. Head counts increasing at one company are often offset by losses from their competitors as they take market share due to increased productivity. The number of auto mechanics went up as the number of horse ranchers went down.Lack of anecdotes and data definitely isn't data. There's an argument to be made here but the OP hasn't made it, just asserted a well written evidenced post is written by an idiot
He has literal examples of head count increasing due to this use of ai, he's not the idiot here.Anecdote are not statistics. Head counts increasing at one company are often offset by losses from their competitors as they take market share due to increased productivity. The number of auto mechanics went up as the number of horse ranchers went down.Lack of anecdotes and data definitely isn't data. There's an argument to be made here but the OP hasn't made it, just asserted a well written evidenced post is written by an idiot
Anecdote are not statistics. Head counts increasing at one company are often offset by losses from their competitors as they take market share due to increased productivity. The number of auto mechanics went up as the number of horse ranchers went down.Lack of anecdotes and data definitely isn't data. There's an argument to be made here but the OP hasn't made it, just asserted a well written evidenced post is written by an idiot
Lack of anecdotes and data definitely isn't data. There's an argument to be made here but the OP hasn't made it, just asserted a well written evidenced post is written by an idiot
He has literal examples of head count increasing due to this use of ai, he's not the idiot here.
Anecdote are not statistics.
Head counts increasing at one company are often offset by losses from their competitors as they take market share due to increased productivity.
The number of auto mechanics went up as the number of horse ranchers went down.
Lack of anecdotes and data definitely isn't data.
There's an argument to be made here but the OP hasn't made it, just asserted a well written evidenced post is written by an idiot