Maryland bill would force gun owners to get $300K liability insurance to wear or carry

MicroWave@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world – 1021 points –
Maryland bill would force gun owners to get $300K liability insurance to wear or carry | WBFF
foxbaltimore.com

Maryland House Democrats introduced a controversial gun safety bill requiring gun owners to forfeit their ability to wear or carry without firearm liability insurance.

Introduced by Del. Terri Hill, D-Howard County, the legislation would prohibit the “wear or carry” of a gun anywhere in the state unless the individual has obtained a liability insurance policy of at least $300,000.

"A person may not wear or carry a firearm unless the person has obtained and it covered by liability insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in the State under the Insurance Article to cover claims for property damage, bodily injury, or death arising from an accident resulting from the person’s use or storage of a firearm or up to $300,000 for damages arising from the same incident, in addition to interest and costs,” the proposed Maryland legislation reads.

625

You are viewing a single comment

It’s wild that “militia” is still considered relevant.

Like, are we really still in a time when your town of 100 settlers might get attacked by Native Americans from the West and the British from the East?

We gonna ring the bell and dole out muskets to every able-bodied man and boy in the village?

Muskets — and ammo, and gunpowder — from the armory, since it was impractical and dangerous to keep that stuff at home?

And lest we forget, these MFers passed ten amendments right off the bat. They thought we’d be ready to change this shit on the fly as the world evolved.

People say they meant for amendments to be difficult to pass. But they really had no idea what the right calibration would be. It was a new thing! And they had just managed to get unanimous buy-in to start the thing. How hard could a 3/4 vote be?