Mastodon's official stance on Threads

brave_lemmywinks@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 512 points –
What to know about Threads
blog.joinmastodon.org
247

You are viewing a single comment

FOSS is the ultimate form of software. It's like life, it will just get copied and forked and modified, and it will continue to evolve because it's been set free in the world.

Yeah, Facebook might embrace-extend-extinguish the Fediverse. But on the other hand, it's not the end of the world if they do. Right now, we have a decentralized platform to post, talk and interact on. If that changes, we will create another one

To me, the most interesting part about this is that the Fediverse is even on Facebook's Meta's radar. It's tiny. Do they see it as a possible competitor?

They see it as free data. Meta will always suck data wherever they can. Remember they have a LLM engine too and lots of money and lots of data to train it on – but more's even better. They can have swarms of bots trained to spread whatever the highest bidder wants them to spread. They can PR whitewash a brand or a celebrity, they can twist events, they can influence elections.

They probably don't need to make a whole platform to do this, though. Couldn't they just slurp the data right out of ActivityPub without making Threads? Either way, I'm dismayed that meta is managing to YET AGAIN convince people that this time they'll be good

It was free data to begin with. It's always been free data. All those internet posts you posted from some lame message board 25 years ago are still there. It's probably still on Archive.org.

If you're concerned about your privacy, don't post shit you don't want out there on a public forum.

Facebook never operated misleading bots. Companies that ran those bots utilized Facebook as their delivery method.

I think it could be a way to get around privacy laws.

Those laws quickly becomes difficult to apply when everyones posts are no longer on central servers owned by meta and instead is copied across thousands of instance owners.

But I think their primary objective is to take on Twitter and get people to use Meta instead. It doesn't cost them much to start experimenting with the tech, and being first somewhere is always an advantage.