and part of being a real bad look, is that trump supporters will use this to dismiss the trials outcome?
And further introducing doubt into the impartiality of the judicial process at this point is NOT a good thing?
Who cares what Trump supporters use to dismiss the outcome? They were going to dismiss it anyway, they can't be reasoned with.
At worst, this is an ethics complaint against Willis. It has no bearing on the case whatsoever, and certainly doesn't reach the f grounds for disqualification. An attorney doesn't have to be pure as the driven snow to do her job, and there's nothing about this relationship that in any way impacts her ability to prosecute this case.
do you want the attorney responsible for prosecuting trump to be racking up ethics complaints while they do it?
I could care less, as long as they get the job done. It has no bearing on the case whatsoever.
can you at least admit that it's a real bad look?
and part of being a real bad look, is that trump supporters will use this to dismiss the trials outcome?
And further introducing doubt into the impartiality of the judicial process at this point is NOT a good thing?
Who cares what Trump supporters use to dismiss the outcome? They were going to dismiss it anyway, they can't be reasoned with.
At worst, this is an ethics complaint against Willis. It has no bearing on the case whatsoever, and certainly doesn't reach the f grounds for disqualification. An attorney doesn't have to be pure as the driven snow to do her job, and there's nothing about this relationship that in any way impacts her ability to prosecute this case.
do you want the attorney responsible for prosecuting trump to be racking up ethics complaints while they do it?
I could care less, as long as they get the job done. It has no bearing on the case whatsoever.
you mean you couldn't care less
Sure, whatever