HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7c668ec0-a3ad-455f-b736-1f5f13808b09.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
![HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/7495b5b3-10fe-402d-bfaa-6abc19dfb51d.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
arstechnica.com
HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors::"Never own a printer again."
You are viewing a single comment
HP wants you to pay up to $36/month to rent a printer that it monitors::"Never own a printer again."
My god, it's so bad
Remote Monitoring. Reads more like something a malware would do.
Holy shit, that’s like a step away from adding in refusal to print things that are potentially copyrighted or otherwise unacceptable