Andrew Tate's arrest prompted by livestreamer who said Tate was leaving Romania, law firm says

some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to News@lemmy.world – 439 points –
Andrew Tate's arrest prompted by livestreamer who said Tate was leaving Romania, law firm says
nbcnews.com

Influencer Adin Ross said he had one last chance to record content with Andrew Tate. A law firm says the comment tipped off U.K. authorities.

I am shocked that Andrew Tater-Tot would attempt to elude justice. Shocked, I tell you.

How fitting that a racist moron who he considers a friend inadvertently gave him away. Awesome with a side of good riddance.

53

You are viewing a single comment

In the US and Canada it is NOT a crime to be creepy. There are many cases that point this out.

You can't just apply laws to people you like it dislike depending on the outcome. That is not a democratic nation of laws. Thats an authoritarian regime. If you cannot see that, you have fallen too deep in your own propaganda.

You aren’t engaging with any point and just spouting “huurrr propaganda”

  1. Tate is under multiple investigations.
  2. Individuals under investigation are held due to being a flight risk

Are you suggesting that anyone under investigation with the means to leave, should just be allowed to flee the investigation?

In the US and Canada

Cool. Irrelevant. tate is in romania, and additionally being investigated in the UK.

The stalking example is barely relevant but anyway.

Stalking isn’t legal in the US

Oh look, canada too

Awesome, you've missed the point entirely. Now lookup the definition of stalking. It is NOT what a rational human would call stalking. There are very strict and rigid requirements. Which is exactly what I'm saying. You just keep proving my point.

? What point am I missing? You brought up stalking, I demonstrated that is a crime regardless of your opinion. Now it seems you want to redefine stalking without providing a definition. Your stalking example is irrelevant anyway, so lets now ignore that.

My point. Tate is a flight risk.

Your point => ???

2 more...
2 more...
2 more...
2 more...