Trial starts for Arizona border rancher charged with killing migrant on his property

MicroWave@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 304 points –
Trial starts for Arizona border rancher charged with killing migrant on his property
apnews.com

An Arizona rancher went on trial Friday in the fatal shooting of a migrant on his property near Mexico, with his defense attorney maintaining his innocence as the national debate over border security heats up ahead of this year’s presidential election.

George Alan Kelly, 75, has been charged with second-degree murder in the killing of a man he encountered on his property outside Nogales, Arizona. The jury trial in Santa Cruz County Superior Court is expected to last up to a month until around April 19, with proceedings held four days a week with Mondays off.

Kelly had earlier rejected a plea deal that would have reduced the charge to one count of negligent homicide if he pleaded guilty. His case has garnered the sympathy of some on the political right, with several efforts raising hundreds of thousands of dollars for his defense, including several on the GoFundMe platform that were quickly shut down because of the charges against him.

He was arrested and charged last year in the Jan. 30, 2023, fatal shooting of 48-year-old Gabriel Cuen-Buitimea of adjacent Nogales, Mexico, just south of the border.

43

You are viewing a single comment

From what I understand you’re free to shoot trespassers on your property, isn’t that what the whole “muh freedom” culture about?

Castle doctrine applies to people trespassing inside of your home, not just anyone on your land. We just had a guy get life in prison for opening fire on college students who drove up his rural driveway when they had the wrong address.

If they let this guy get away with what he did, it's actually a pretty scary precident for all of us.

You should read the article.

I think he's lying, but the defense's claim is that the group the man was in posed a credible threat, as an armed group.

Of course, his victim didn't have any weapons, so gl with that one buddy. We don't have the full picture but that's a pretty damning detail by itself.

I already read the article. Jesus what a shitty take this is...

Why would you think the victim's ethnicity (and the resulting presumption of criminality) is an appropriate defense for his killing? By that logic racists would be allowed to gun down Black people based on whatever violent stereotype they believe about them...

5 more...
5 more...
5 more...