Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter

Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world – 517 points –
Musk Admits He Doesn't Fact-Check Himself and Has Two Burner Accounts on Twitter
rollingstone.com

Elon Musk‘s erratic posting on X, formerly Twitter, has come back to haunt him once again as a 22-year-old Jewish man pursues a defamation case over tweets in which the tech mogul baselessly suggested the recent college graduate was an undercover federal agent posing as a neo-Nazi during a street fight between far-right groups. Musk’s excruciating March 27 deposition in the matter, which a judge ordered released to the public over the objections of the CEO’s lawyer, reveals the extent to which he has continually sabotaged both himself and the social media platform he owns.

121

You are viewing a single comment

Do you have sources that show he intentionally censored voices? He would be a huge hypocrite depending on how that was done.

There are numerous examples available to anyone who looks for it. Here’s one where he banned a bunch of journalists who had been critical of him, using an excuse about “doxxing”:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/twitter-journalist-suspend-1.6688110

There’s another where he suspended the account of a prominent Tesla critic:

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/15/elon-musk-led-twitter-suspended-plainsite-a-prominent-tesla-critic.html

Thank you for sharing.

Hm, in the first link, the journalist seems to have contributed to the incentivization of giving people the power to find and try to harm/kill Elon. I personally feel that directly incentivizing and feeding information for possible murder of an individual is one of the few things I would agree with keeping away from the app myself.

As for the second link it reads like a red flag for me. The reasoning to the ban is not there. And any estimates of why fall short with obscurity. At least within' the article. Generally when something is obscure I assume the worst. But part of me wonders if details were left out from the article. I'd need to do more research. Looks bad for Elon though.

“incentivizing and feeding information for possible murder of an individual” is the dramatic excuse musk used, correct. “Assassination coordinates”. I’m not sure where you got incentivized from though. They were accounts that discussed the elonjet account which republished freely available public flight information. Note that musk reinstated these accounts:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/dec/17/elon-musk-reinstates-twitter-accounts-of-suspended-journalists

As the platform owner, there are also other ways he could reduce the reach of accounts, which would be difficult to independently prove.