Funny, those guys don't usually agree on that much

FozzyOsbourne@lemm.ee to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 424 points –

Do any of them know what the word "liberal" actually means?

410

You are viewing a single comment

Individual rights to become a Capital Owner and exploit the majority of society is by definition class society. In Socialism, there are no classes, because ownership is shared. There are no Capitalists exploiting workers.

You don't know enough about Socialism or Capitalism to discuss either.

No, you don't know enough if you think that equal freedoms and rights lead to "exploitation" and "classes" while inherently authoritarian ideology means there are no classes. Like, lol, what kind of lunacy is that?

Workers do not have equal rights with Owners.

How is democratic ownership of Capital "inherently authoritarian?"

Once again, there are no workers. Learn some basics first.

Who do Capitalists employ? Fairies?

No one "employs" anyone.

...what? Do you know what a "job" is?

Mate, are you really 13 years old or something?

You outright stated that nobody is employed.

No, I've never said that. You're actually 13, omg...

You did, lol. Can't be employed if there'a nobody employing.

Mate, once again, there are NO workers. Let that sink in. Then we can continue.

What do you call someone who works a job? A jobber?

You have a fundamentally entirely different definition of terms from the rest of Humanity.

1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...
1 more...