What if the length of a term was proportional to the amount you won by in the election?
![](https://lemmy.fbxl.net/pictrs/image/96bcc0d7-d5f7-485f-b65b-1254ff6c4728.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/5170ed37-415d-42be-a3e7-3edd79eda681.png)
Seems odd that if you win by 0.001% that's treated the same as if you win by 50%. "You barely won, here's the same mandate as someone who won soundly"
Probably a bad idea, but there's an idea in there that isn't dumb.
You are viewing a single comment
would you want Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho in office for that long?
Compared to a lot of what I've been seeing, Camacho isn't looking half bad right now.
at this point, I've resigned myself to the fact that Idiocracy has become canon.
2036 Presidential Election: You voting for Amazon or Meta?