It should be revoked upon conviction in the same filing. It isn't, which creates a delay and that is a problem. They shouldn't be pursuing it, it should already be revoked and a sheriff or state police should have taken it from him after conviction.
I don't necessarily agree with revoking rights for non-violent felonies without exigent circumstances, but he would fit my exemption.
Permit or not, he is still a Person Prohibited upon the instant of conviction. There is no delay or filing required. It is illegal for him to possess a firearm under both New York and federal law, presence of a soon-to-be-revoked New York carry permit or not.
He can’t carry a firearm, but he can have nuclear launch codes.
Our system is so fucked.
Okay, just to be clear, he can't have those (unless America does another oopsie)
Join us for Roaring Kitty’s livestream about GameStop Friday for a demonstration of how fucked the system truly is.
Well yes, that's how felonies work
It should be revoked upon conviction in the same filing. It isn't, which creates a delay and that is a problem. They shouldn't be pursuing it, it should already be revoked and a sheriff or state police should have taken it from him after conviction.
I don't necessarily agree with revoking rights for non-violent felonies without exigent circumstances, but he would fit my exemption.
Permit or not, he is still a Person Prohibited upon the instant of conviction. There is no delay or filing required. It is illegal for him to possess a firearm under both New York and federal law, presence of a soon-to-be-revoked New York carry permit or not.
He can’t carry a firearm, but he can have nuclear launch codes.
Our system is so fucked.
Okay, just to be clear, he can't have those (unless America does another oopsie)
Join us for Roaring Kitty’s livestream about GameStop Friday for a demonstration of how fucked the system truly is.
It does for everyone else