I'm mostly surprised the NYT is the one publishing this. It's read more like a capitalist shill rag trying to play both sides for at least a decade. Never taking the shots it needed to at the right even when there were facts to do so and not editorials/opinions.
They're playing a game of access journalism, where they do puff pieces to gain access to wealth and power, and value that over pretty much anything else.
I'm mostly surprised the NYT is the one publishing this. It's read more like a capitalist shill rag trying to play both sides for at least a decade. Never taking the shots it needed to at the right even when there were facts to do so and not editorials/opinions.
They're playing a game of access journalism, where they do puff pieces to gain access to wealth and power, and value that over pretty much anything else.
I thought the same thing.