U.K.’s Richest Family Spent More on Dog Than Paying Staff, Court Hearsjeffw@lemmy.worldmod to News@lemmy.world – 176 points – 2 weeks agothedailybeast.com7Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent comment Some members of the staff also felt their compensation was better than they might otherwise have earned in India, the defense argued. Is this a real lawyer? They clearly have no legal case. I hope the book gets thrown at them.They have money, history says no."But I'm one of the good slave owners! Look how much they like being my slave!"What do you mean they aren't tax deductible?
Some members of the staff also felt their compensation was better than they might otherwise have earned in India, the defense argued. Is this a real lawyer? They clearly have no legal case. I hope the book gets thrown at them.They have money, history says no."But I'm one of the good slave owners! Look how much they like being my slave!"What do you mean they aren't tax deductible?
"But I'm one of the good slave owners! Look how much they like being my slave!"What do you mean they aren't tax deductible?
Is this a real lawyer? They clearly have no legal case. I hope the book gets thrown at them.
They have money, history says no.
"But I'm one of the good slave owners! Look how much they like being my slave!"
What do you mean they aren't tax deductible?