Intel is quitting on its adorable, powerful, and upgradable mini NUC computers

tuxprint@lemmy.tuxprint.com to Selfhosted@lemmy.world – 755 points –
Intel is quitting on its adorable, powerful, and upgradable mini NUC computers
theverge.com

Damn, this is a sad day for the homelab.

The article says Intel is working with partners to "continue NUC innovation and growth", so we will see what that manifests as.

235

You are viewing a single comment

Only two kinds of people believe in infinite growth; economists and psychopaths.

Only two kinds of people believe in infinite growth; economists and psychopaths.

But you repeat yourself :)

When the money supply grows infinitely then everything priced in it has to grow infinitely

Maybe capitalists instead of economists? 😂

Capitalists are behind the most prelavent economic school (neoliberalism) today—just look at the history of the "Chicago school". I doubt the capitalists themselves believe that BS, but it's profitable for them to make the rest of the world to believe it.

I highly recommend evonomics.com, some rally good essays on there about the cult-like economic beliefs of today. Written by economists who've seen through the BS.

So we're going with an ad hominem attack instead of engaging in good faith?

Pretending like capitalism is this new concept that needs to be fully explored and debated before we understand that it's bad is a pretty bad faith framing of the issue. Infinite economic growth is literally impossible because Earth has finite resources and there is a finite number of humans. There is no necessity or imperative behind infinite economic growth other than to make the ruling class richer at everyone else's expense.

I would say just generalizing capitalism as 'bad' is also not in good faith. It is not without issues, and letting it be completely unrestrained would probably be disastrous. But no other economic system has lifted more people out of abject poverty or driven technological innovation as hard. There are benefits.

There's the old "more people were in poverty before capitalism" argument.

Did capitalism bring people out of poverty? Or did access to education, healthcare, social safety nets, and proper food bring people out of poverty? Where I live, capitalism is what's driving people into tent cities.

How does one person controlling the capital in an area, help other people if they're gatekeeping the economic prosperity from by forcing them to perform labour, at a disproportionately low rate of recompense, to help them (the capital owner) increase their net worth? Don't even say trickle down economics or I'll deck you.

This has nothing to do with capitalism. And my source explains how infinite growth is possible. Consuming the resources of a finite system is not the only factor that goes into economic growth.