Supreme Court rejects challenge to Biden admin's contact with social media companies - ABC News
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ab6c1026-c17b-4d99-8f56-607b3dae407b.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/db7182d9-181a-45e1-b0aa-6768f144911a.jpeg)
![Supreme Court rejects challenge to Biden admin contact with social media companies](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/40d47eab-4e3b-4d5f-9db9-e8102700ebe1.jpeg?format=jpg&thumbnail=256)
abcnews.go.com
GOP states claimed the White House tried to censor COVID, election information.
You are viewing a single comment
GOP states claimed the White House tried to censor COVID, election information.
She's saying the states don't have standing to bring the suit. They're unable to prove they were harmed specifically, so they don't have standing.
A better way to read the phrase in question would be "the court's doctrine regarding standing"
See: Standing
I totally understand what she's saying. What I don't understand is how three people can possibly disagree with this. This doesn't seem to be a subjective matter at all.
Thomas and Alito prettymuch always just start from the result they want and work backwards.