The Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treat

jeffw@lemmy.worldmod to News@lemmy.world – 1217 points –
The Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treat
vox.com
153

You are viewing a single comment

So that means that I can engage in a a little tax evasion, as a treat, right?

On a serious note, from the article:

the law makes it a very serious crime, punishable by up to 15 years in prison, for a federal official to accept a bribe

Can we start actually enforcing this please?

Define bribe and you’ll start to see where enforcing this becomes a problem. Especially with legalized corruption in the form of lobbying and ‘gifts’.

Well, federal officials are already forbidden from accepting gifts/anything valued more than $25 in one instance, and no more than $100 a year from any one group or person. Enforcing that seems like a good place to start.

Billionaires can just make a coupon thousand shell orgs to funnel $100ks into their pockets.

Legislators, executives, and jurists aren’t officials in the sense you mean. They are referring to government employees, who can still receive every joyful punishment a prosecutor can dream of.

Well, perhaps the wording should be amended to encompass all public employees. But that would require the law be rewritten by the people that benefit from it, so, yeah.

Can we start actually enforcing this please?

No. You can't bind the rich.