The Supreme Court rules that state officials can engage in a little corruption, as a treatjeffw@lemmy.worldmod to News@lemmy.world – 1217 points – 3 months agovox.com153Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentNo see the first one is a bribe, the second one is a job. I'm paying you for your time! /sThat was actually the argument made by the official in question. Called it a "consulting fee".I should've been a consultant. I could have a few yachts by now...my country would be destroyed, but at least I could be in my own little world.
No see the first one is a bribe, the second one is a job. I'm paying you for your time! /sThat was actually the argument made by the official in question. Called it a "consulting fee".I should've been a consultant. I could have a few yachts by now...my country would be destroyed, but at least I could be in my own little world.
That was actually the argument made by the official in question. Called it a "consulting fee".I should've been a consultant. I could have a few yachts by now...my country would be destroyed, but at least I could be in my own little world.
I should've been a consultant. I could have a few yachts by now...my country would be destroyed, but at least I could be in my own little world.
No see the first one is a bribe, the second one is a job. I'm paying you for your time! /s
That was actually the argument made by the official in question. Called it a "consulting fee".
I should've been a consultant. I could have a few yachts by now...my country would be destroyed, but at least I could be in my own little world.