US Gaza aid pier to be permanently dismantled after operating for just 20 days – reports | The Guardianfilister@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.world – 195 points – 2 months agotheguardian.com45Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentHow so?To rescue the 4 hostages in return for almost 300 dead Palestinians and magnitudes more of wounded people.This right here is the correct answer.I don't think it's credible to say that The pier was built for the Israeli rescue operations. In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary There's absolutely no way they'd have allowed it's construction of it wasn't necessary for them. We can tell because it's already being dismantled
How so?To rescue the 4 hostages in return for almost 300 dead Palestinians and magnitudes more of wounded people.This right here is the correct answer.I don't think it's credible to say that The pier was built for the Israeli rescue operations. In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary There's absolutely no way they'd have allowed it's construction of it wasn't necessary for them. We can tell because it's already being dismantled
To rescue the 4 hostages in return for almost 300 dead Palestinians and magnitudes more of wounded people.This right here is the correct answer.I don't think it's credible to say that The pier was built for the Israeli rescue operations. In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary There's absolutely no way they'd have allowed it's construction of it wasn't necessary for them. We can tell because it's already being dismantled
This right here is the correct answer.I don't think it's credible to say that The pier was built for the Israeli rescue operations. In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary There's absolutely no way they'd have allowed it's construction of it wasn't necessary for them. We can tell because it's already being dismantled
I don't think it's credible to say that The pier was built for the Israeli rescue operations. In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary There's absolutely no way they'd have allowed it's construction of it wasn't necessary for them. We can tell because it's already being dismantled
In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary There's absolutely no way they'd have allowed it's construction of it wasn't necessary for them. We can tell because it's already being dismantled
How so?
To rescue the 4 hostages in return for almost 300 dead Palestinians and magnitudes more of wounded people.
This right here is the correct answer.
I don't think it's credible to say that The pier was built for the Israeli rescue operations.
In fact, without the pier they still would have executed the operation. Pier was convenient, but not necessary
There's absolutely no way they'd have allowed it's construction of it wasn't necessary for them. We can tell because it's already being dismantled