Did #julialang end up kinda stalling or at least plateau-ing lower than hoped?

maegul@hachyderm.io to Programming@programming.dev – 32 points –

Did #julialang end up kinda stalling or at least plateau-ing lower than hoped?

I know it's got its community and dedicated users and has continued development.

But without being in that space, and speculating now at a distance, it seems it might be an interesting case study in a tech/lang that just didn't have landing spot it could arrive at in time as the tech-world & "data science" reshuffled while julia tried to grow ... ?

Can a language ever solve a "two language" problem?

@programming

29

You are viewing a single comment

@maegul

Considering, it may be worth highlighting that tools like Jax exist as well (https://github.com/google/jax). These have even become an expected integration in some toolkits (e.g., numpyro)

It may not be the most elegant approach, but there's a lot of power in something that "mostly just works and then we can optimize narrowly once we find a problem"

It doesn't make a solution that solves this mess bad, but I do wonder about it being a narrow niche

@tschenkel @astrojuanlu @programming

@hrefna @tschenkel @astrojuanlu @programming

Yea ... it seems that things like this are part of Julia's problem ...

that for many the "two language problem" is actually the "two language solution" that's working just fine and as intended, or as you say, well enough to make an ecosystem jump seem too costly.

2 more...