JPEG is Dying - And that's a bad thing | 2kliksphilipProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Technology@lemmy.world – 340 points – 1 months agoyoutube.com150Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentWhat a dumb comment. All of that adds up when you have thousands or tens of thousands of images. Or even when you're just loading a very media-heavy website. The compression used by JPEG-XL is very, very good. As is the decoding/encoding performance, both in single core and in multi-core applications. It's royalty free. Supports animation. Supports transparency. Supports layers. Supports HDR. Supports a bit depth of 32 compared to, what, 8? JPEG-XL is what we should be striving for.7 more...
What a dumb comment. All of that adds up when you have thousands or tens of thousands of images. Or even when you're just loading a very media-heavy website. The compression used by JPEG-XL is very, very good. As is the decoding/encoding performance, both in single core and in multi-core applications. It's royalty free. Supports animation. Supports transparency. Supports layers. Supports HDR. Supports a bit depth of 32 compared to, what, 8? JPEG-XL is what we should be striving for.7 more...
What a dumb comment.
All of that adds up when you have thousands or tens of thousands of images. Or even when you're just loading a very media-heavy website.
The compression used by JPEG-XL is very, very good. As is the decoding/encoding performance, both in single core and in multi-core applications.
It's royalty free. Supports animation. Supports transparency. Supports layers. Supports HDR. Supports a bit depth of 32 compared to, what, 8?
JPEG-XL is what we should be striving for.