Algerian Imane Khelif wins boxing gold medal after her gender was wrongly questionedMicroWave@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.world – 765 points – 1 months agonbcnews.com336Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentCool. You read the Wikipedia article. Let me know when you actually read Russell.I will note that you are the one making claims without evidence about what Russell wrote and by your own logic, the burden of proof is on you.What claims do you imagine I’m making?You're claiming that Russell addressed the claim that there is in fact strong evidence against the teapot.And you expect me to what, spend money on an ebook and start pasting from it to prove that an author you clearly haven’t read addressed your point?
Cool. You read the Wikipedia article. Let me know when you actually read Russell.I will note that you are the one making claims without evidence about what Russell wrote and by your own logic, the burden of proof is on you.What claims do you imagine I’m making?You're claiming that Russell addressed the claim that there is in fact strong evidence against the teapot.And you expect me to what, spend money on an ebook and start pasting from it to prove that an author you clearly haven’t read addressed your point?
I will note that you are the one making claims without evidence about what Russell wrote and by your own logic, the burden of proof is on you.What claims do you imagine I’m making?You're claiming that Russell addressed the claim that there is in fact strong evidence against the teapot.And you expect me to what, spend money on an ebook and start pasting from it to prove that an author you clearly haven’t read addressed your point?
What claims do you imagine I’m making?You're claiming that Russell addressed the claim that there is in fact strong evidence against the teapot.And you expect me to what, spend money on an ebook and start pasting from it to prove that an author you clearly haven’t read addressed your point?
You're claiming that Russell addressed the claim that there is in fact strong evidence against the teapot.And you expect me to what, spend money on an ebook and start pasting from it to prove that an author you clearly haven’t read addressed your point?
And you expect me to what, spend money on an ebook and start pasting from it to prove that an author you clearly haven’t read addressed your point?
Cool. You read the Wikipedia article. Let me know when you actually read Russell.
I will note that you are the one making claims without evidence about what Russell wrote and by your own logic, the burden of proof is on you.
What claims do you imagine I’m making?
You're claiming that Russell addressed the claim that there is in fact strong evidence against the teapot.
And you expect me to what, spend money on an ebook and start pasting from it to prove that an author you clearly haven’t read addressed your point?