Harris’s New Strategy: Equate Fighting Climate Change With ‘Freedom’ | The Harris campaign isn’t offering details on climate policy but is framing fight to protect the environment as one of patriotismsilence7@slrpnk.net to politics @lemmy.world – 128 points – 1 months agonytimes.com18Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentOMG patriotism doesn't have to involve treasonNo, but it does involve blind loyalty, which allows politicians to get away with a bunch of shitLol no. Remember here: Democrats just forced a sitting President to not run for re-electionThe donor class forced a sitting president to not run for re election..He could have told the big money folks to piss off if he had popular support. He didn'tHe didn't have popular support.Exactly what I was saying, though I had a typo where I substituted "of" for "if"
OMG patriotism doesn't have to involve treasonNo, but it does involve blind loyalty, which allows politicians to get away with a bunch of shitLol no. Remember here: Democrats just forced a sitting President to not run for re-electionThe donor class forced a sitting president to not run for re election..He could have told the big money folks to piss off if he had popular support. He didn'tHe didn't have popular support.Exactly what I was saying, though I had a typo where I substituted "of" for "if"
No, but it does involve blind loyalty, which allows politicians to get away with a bunch of shitLol no. Remember here: Democrats just forced a sitting President to not run for re-electionThe donor class forced a sitting president to not run for re election..He could have told the big money folks to piss off if he had popular support. He didn'tHe didn't have popular support.Exactly what I was saying, though I had a typo where I substituted "of" for "if"
Lol no. Remember here: Democrats just forced a sitting President to not run for re-electionThe donor class forced a sitting president to not run for re election..He could have told the big money folks to piss off if he had popular support. He didn'tHe didn't have popular support.Exactly what I was saying, though I had a typo where I substituted "of" for "if"
The donor class forced a sitting president to not run for re election..He could have told the big money folks to piss off if he had popular support. He didn'tHe didn't have popular support.Exactly what I was saying, though I had a typo where I substituted "of" for "if"
He could have told the big money folks to piss off if he had popular support. He didn'tHe didn't have popular support.Exactly what I was saying, though I had a typo where I substituted "of" for "if"
He didn't have popular support.Exactly what I was saying, though I had a typo where I substituted "of" for "if"
OMG patriotism doesn't have to involve treason
No, but it does involve blind loyalty, which allows politicians to get away with a bunch of shit
Lol no. Remember here: Democrats just forced a sitting President to not run for re-election
The donor class forced a sitting president to not run for re election..
He could have told the big money folks to piss off if he had popular support. He didn't
He didn't have popular support.
Exactly what I was saying, though I had a typo where I substituted "of" for "if"