The Arctic ocean photographed in the same place, 107 years ago vs today.philz@lemmy.world to pics@lemmy.world – 1166 points – 3 days agoHere is the original article from 2002 118Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentWhat does that have to do with pictures of a glacier obviously melting drastically in a short time?It doesn't. It's almost like you are wilfully ignorant about thinking critically.So you have no point at all? I've asked you multiple times what you're talking about and your only response is "nothing". Are you mental?You asked me what I was implying, I told you nothing, then pointed to my explicit point.Your explicit point is to be skeptical that glaciers are melting? The fuck?I can't tell if you are actually this clueless or just disingenuous.Apparently I'm clueless, because everything you've said has no barring on the post we're in.
What does that have to do with pictures of a glacier obviously melting drastically in a short time?It doesn't. It's almost like you are wilfully ignorant about thinking critically.So you have no point at all? I've asked you multiple times what you're talking about and your only response is "nothing". Are you mental?You asked me what I was implying, I told you nothing, then pointed to my explicit point.Your explicit point is to be skeptical that glaciers are melting? The fuck?I can't tell if you are actually this clueless or just disingenuous.Apparently I'm clueless, because everything you've said has no barring on the post we're in.
It doesn't. It's almost like you are wilfully ignorant about thinking critically.So you have no point at all? I've asked you multiple times what you're talking about and your only response is "nothing". Are you mental?You asked me what I was implying, I told you nothing, then pointed to my explicit point.Your explicit point is to be skeptical that glaciers are melting? The fuck?I can't tell if you are actually this clueless or just disingenuous.Apparently I'm clueless, because everything you've said has no barring on the post we're in.
So you have no point at all? I've asked you multiple times what you're talking about and your only response is "nothing". Are you mental?You asked me what I was implying, I told you nothing, then pointed to my explicit point.Your explicit point is to be skeptical that glaciers are melting? The fuck?I can't tell if you are actually this clueless or just disingenuous.Apparently I'm clueless, because everything you've said has no barring on the post we're in.
You asked me what I was implying, I told you nothing, then pointed to my explicit point.Your explicit point is to be skeptical that glaciers are melting? The fuck?I can't tell if you are actually this clueless or just disingenuous.Apparently I'm clueless, because everything you've said has no barring on the post we're in.
Your explicit point is to be skeptical that glaciers are melting? The fuck?I can't tell if you are actually this clueless or just disingenuous.Apparently I'm clueless, because everything you've said has no barring on the post we're in.
I can't tell if you are actually this clueless or just disingenuous.Apparently I'm clueless, because everything you've said has no barring on the post we're in.
What does that have to do with pictures of a glacier obviously melting drastically in a short time?
It doesn't. It's almost like you are wilfully ignorant about thinking critically.
So you have no point at all? I've asked you multiple times what you're talking about and your only response is "nothing".
Are you mental?
You asked me what I was implying, I told you nothing, then pointed to my explicit point.
Your explicit point is to be skeptical that glaciers are melting? The fuck?
I can't tell if you are actually this clueless or just disingenuous.
Apparently I'm clueless, because everything you've said has no barring on the post we're in.