Reddit is making sitewide protests basically impossiblekingthrillgore@lemmy.mlbanned from sitebanned from site to Technology@lemmy.world – 1245 points – 1 months agotheverge.com434Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsI don't get why people don't just leavebecause other people haven't left yetah the old catch 22 that is the right use of that term right?A requires B but B requires A so neither gets started. I think Catch 22 is A requires B but B nullifies A so A is guaranteed to not get started. but there's no need to be that pedantic, casually speaking. people know what you mean when you say catch 22. we could also just say it's paradoxical. This was the last straw for me, running Redact right now.I had to laugh when I got banned from a sub because I used redact.
I don't get why people don't just leavebecause other people haven't left yetah the old catch 22 that is the right use of that term right?A requires B but B requires A so neither gets started. I think Catch 22 is A requires B but B nullifies A so A is guaranteed to not get started. but there's no need to be that pedantic, casually speaking. people know what you mean when you say catch 22. we could also just say it's paradoxical. This was the last straw for me, running Redact right now.I had to laugh when I got banned from a sub because I used redact.
because other people haven't left yetah the old catch 22 that is the right use of that term right?A requires B but B requires A so neither gets started. I think Catch 22 is A requires B but B nullifies A so A is guaranteed to not get started. but there's no need to be that pedantic, casually speaking. people know what you mean when you say catch 22. we could also just say it's paradoxical.
ah the old catch 22 that is the right use of that term right?A requires B but B requires A so neither gets started. I think Catch 22 is A requires B but B nullifies A so A is guaranteed to not get started. but there's no need to be that pedantic, casually speaking. people know what you mean when you say catch 22. we could also just say it's paradoxical.
A requires B but B requires A so neither gets started. I think Catch 22 is A requires B but B nullifies A so A is guaranteed to not get started. but there's no need to be that pedantic, casually speaking. people know what you mean when you say catch 22. we could also just say it's paradoxical.
This was the last straw for me, running Redact right now.I had to laugh when I got banned from a sub because I used redact.
I don't get why people don't just leave
because other people haven't left yet
ah the old catch 22
that is the right use of that term right?A requires B but B requires A so neither gets started.
I think Catch 22 is A requires B but B nullifies A so A is guaranteed to not get started.
but there's no need to be that pedantic, casually speaking. people know what you mean when you say catch 22. we could also just say it's paradoxical.
This was the last straw for me, running Redact right now.
I had to laugh when I got banned from a sub because I used redact.