More than a quarter of new code at Google is generated by AI.Dot.@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.world – 107 points – 5 days agotheverge.com33Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent comment I really don’t believe the headline. The The company had a strong quarter thanks in large part to AI. part is what makes it sound strange to me, sounds like shareholder egostrking. That said all they need to do is mandate use of AI during development like my company's done and they can boast this kind of bullshit easily. That said all they need to do is mandate use of AI during development Wtf does that mean? Like what if you know exactly what you want to do? Do you have to ask GPT to review your code?Where i work they had us use AI with the IDEs. I'd say about 20% of the times what it suggests is actually usable. That's autocomplete on steroids for you.
I really don’t believe the headline. The The company had a strong quarter thanks in large part to AI. part is what makes it sound strange to me, sounds like shareholder egostrking. That said all they need to do is mandate use of AI during development like my company's done and they can boast this kind of bullshit easily. That said all they need to do is mandate use of AI during development Wtf does that mean? Like what if you know exactly what you want to do? Do you have to ask GPT to review your code?Where i work they had us use AI with the IDEs. I'd say about 20% of the times what it suggests is actually usable. That's autocomplete on steroids for you.
That said all they need to do is mandate use of AI during development Wtf does that mean? Like what if you know exactly what you want to do? Do you have to ask GPT to review your code?Where i work they had us use AI with the IDEs. I'd say about 20% of the times what it suggests is actually usable. That's autocomplete on steroids for you.
Where i work they had us use AI with the IDEs. I'd say about 20% of the times what it suggests is actually usable. That's autocomplete on steroids for you.
The The company had a strong quarter thanks in large part to AI. part is what makes it sound strange to me, sounds like shareholder egostrking.
That said all they need to do is mandate use of AI during development like my company's done and they can boast this kind of bullshit easily.
Wtf does that mean? Like what if you know exactly what you want to do? Do you have to ask GPT to review your code?
Where i work they had us use AI with the IDEs.
I'd say about 20% of the times what it suggests is actually usable.
That's autocomplete on steroids for you.