Red Hat refuses Alma's CVE patches to CentOS Stream; says "no customer demand"

cleric_splash@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml – 785 points –
129

You are viewing a single comment

As someone interviewing for Canonical's Security team (they make you do like 10 interviews, I'm like 5 deep over 3 weeks), I cannot imagine anyone security-minded writing that comment. It either:

  • Comes from higher up
  • Michal doesn't think security is important

Can you prove that your joining Canonical (picture proof), as you know, people can be anything in the internet while they're in their parent's basement.

If you are, what type of interview questions do they ask?

Are you this obnoxious to people you meet offline?

Vim or emacs?

He has not joined yet. What is he supposed to prove?

Proof that he is being interviewed by canonical, which he did send, which I am grateful for.

Ain't nothing wrong with asking for proof and you shouldn't be mad as anyone can be behind a username with or without a pfp.

@MrOzwaldMan first you attack someone then want an answer, interesting strategy

I mean anyone can be behind a username with or without a pfp.

How would I know NoobMaster69 is a Google Software Engineer or a part time Janitor or a 9yo using ChatGOT

I mean sure, here you go. I'm in stage 3 of 4 right now:

Congrats, I hope you excel in your journey with canonical.