Alpine Linux does not make the news

pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml – 114 points –
drewdevault.com
34

You are viewing a single comment

I tried Alpine for a desktop installation. The package manager has surprisingly decent package set. And the performance is the best I found, for some reason applications starts faster. But I had to stop the experience because websites thats includes widevine didn't work. Its sad to say, but many softwares relies on non-standard glibc shit. With glibc instead of musl Alpine can be simply the best distro. If musl is not faster that glibc I don't think glibc will make Alpine slower.

Alpine's main thing is musl. musl is a lot better than glib, but you have to compile for it, which means no proprietary software.

Why is musl better than glibc? Looking at the licence, it's just your classic corporate cuckolding that always leads to a net decrease in upstream contributions

yeah, fair enough, that's a good point. Also now that I think about it, the dns resolution in musl is pretty bad, too. But I do appreciate that musl is designed to be lighter weight than glib, and that it supports static linking.

The glibc can be introduced by an Alpine fork, so Alpine can stay pure.

1 more...