Utah Supreme Court reviews abortion ban; judge notes historical omission of women's voices
axios.com
Not all Utahns were included at the 1895 convention, Judge Paige Petersen noted.
• "Women were in the audience, but they weren't any of the delegates," Petersen said.
• "How do we know … what they thought the meaning of their rights were?" Peterson asked. "It seems important in this context because women are the ones that experience pregnancy and experience childbirth."
You are viewing a single comment
I get your sentiment of your despair, but shitty lawyers are gonna be shitty lawyers. What would actually be worse is the judge accepting this argument in 2023.
Clarence Thomas enters the chat
The dude that cited 12th century English common law?
No, that's the other morally bankrupt fossil.