šŸ˜²šŸ˜²

euphoria@kbin.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world – 843 points –
64

You are viewing a single comment

I can imagine not considering the first Dragon Quest an RPG would create a lot of discussion, I canā€™t really speak for that since I havenā€™t played it but I guess some of the ā€œcanonsā€ mustā€™ve been missing since it used a password system.

Would Dark Souls count as an RPG in your definition? Thereā€™s no definite classes but youā€™re definitely shaping up your character to be a Warrior, Mage, and so on.

I added Dark Souls into the list before I saw this comment; because usually when I talk about this subject, I list it. I try to use variety in my examples, but I just forgot for a moment about listing Dark Souls ^^

Oh lol. Then yeah, I think we pretty much agree.

What about Roguelikes? Wikipedia lists it as a subgenre of RPGs but Iā€™m not sure if Iā€™d consider them as such.

Wikipedia is written by humans, a.k.a. non-objective people, which is why they call it "duodecimal counting" instead of "dozenal counting" and used to have Talk wars on that page about it. The irrational side won.

If a game has classes like I said before, then it's a class-playing game, a.k.a. RPG. Something can be a roguelike but not an RPG. Also "roguelike" is a pretty dumb name for a genre and itself causes a lot of problems, but I digress.

Itā€™s just one of many genres/subgenres that has one groundbreaking game/saga as origin and all the games that took inspiration from it, like Metroidvania or Soulslike. Just creating a new term for each of them would make initial discussions much weirder, although it would probably be clearer later on (nowadays most people that know what a Roguelike is donā€™t even know ā€œRogueā€ is an actual game)