Pornhub Sues Texas Over Age Verification Lawpsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.world – 1139 points – 11 months agovice.com274Post a CommentPreviewYou are viewing a single commentView all commentsShow the parent commentPossession is illegal in a majority of states https://www.cga.ct.gov/2005/rpt/2005-r-0269.htmYou're still ignoring my first point which is the much more important distinction. It's not speech.It’s not a free speech issue.The literal lawsuit says otherwise. It's the first claim they wrote.I have my doubts it’ll succeed on free speech arguments alone.I have my doubts that people should comment on things they clearly haven't read, but here we are.
Possession is illegal in a majority of states https://www.cga.ct.gov/2005/rpt/2005-r-0269.htmYou're still ignoring my first point which is the much more important distinction. It's not speech.It’s not a free speech issue.The literal lawsuit says otherwise. It's the first claim they wrote.I have my doubts it’ll succeed on free speech arguments alone.I have my doubts that people should comment on things they clearly haven't read, but here we are.
You're still ignoring my first point which is the much more important distinction. It's not speech.It’s not a free speech issue.The literal lawsuit says otherwise. It's the first claim they wrote.I have my doubts it’ll succeed on free speech arguments alone.I have my doubts that people should comment on things they clearly haven't read, but here we are.
It’s not a free speech issue.The literal lawsuit says otherwise. It's the first claim they wrote.I have my doubts it’ll succeed on free speech arguments alone.I have my doubts that people should comment on things they clearly haven't read, but here we are.
The literal lawsuit says otherwise. It's the first claim they wrote.I have my doubts it’ll succeed on free speech arguments alone.I have my doubts that people should comment on things they clearly haven't read, but here we are.
I have my doubts it’ll succeed on free speech arguments alone.I have my doubts that people should comment on things they clearly haven't read, but here we are.
Possession is illegal in a majority of states
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2005/rpt/2005-r-0269.htm
You're still ignoring my first point which is the much more important distinction. It's not speech.
It’s not a free speech issue.
The literal lawsuit says otherwise. It's the first claim they wrote.
I have my doubts it’ll succeed on free speech arguments alone.
I have my doubts that people should comment on things they clearly haven't read, but here we are.