Trump criticizes judge after he’s warned against ‘inflammatory statements’
thehill.com
Former President Trump criticized the judge presiding over his 2020 election case, just days after she warned him against making any “inflammatory statements” that could intimidate witnesses or prejudice the jury pool.
In a statement posted overnight on Truth Social, Trump called U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan “highly partisan” and “very biased & unfair.”
“She obviously wants me behind bars,” he added.
You are viewing a single comment
Then let there be riots. The man needs his due.
That’s why there’s an Insurrection Act.
Right? This whole "we can't punish criminals because other criminals might engage in criminal behavior" attitude is mystifying to me. What ever happened with not negotiating with terrorists as a national policy?
It is very odd, someone was claiming we should have let him win the other day because this would have been less dangerous. That is so fucked up. Appeasement is almost never a viable long-term solution is politics and geo-politics. The best time to deal with an abusive force is yesterday, not pulling the Band-Aid early is just making things worse. They will riots anyway, unless he turns America into autocracy, only at this point we won't have to worry about riots.
Anyone saying that is either a shill or a coward, and neither are people we should listen to. Our grandparents and great grandparents didn't sacrifice everything in WWII just for us to allow fucking Nazis to waltz into power uncontested.
The very scenario that quote came from was one of... Extensive, and disastrous, negotiation with terrorists. So, not much has changed.