A Logical Way to Split Long Lineslearnbyexample@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev – 24 points – 3 months agosamwho.dev4Post a CommentPreviewHotTopNewOldThe "rectangle" probably isn't supposed to be this messy? Not my blog, just sharing it here. That said, I don't see that broken rectangle on Chromium.In my Firefox I get a NS_BINDING_ABORTED error on the Google Fonts font request. And they didn't specify a font fallback, only their external web font. It would have worked if they had added monospace as a fallback.Seems like a valid formalization. I think a or a few counter-examples would go a long way though.
The "rectangle" probably isn't supposed to be this messy? Not my blog, just sharing it here. That said, I don't see that broken rectangle on Chromium.In my Firefox I get a NS_BINDING_ABORTED error on the Google Fonts font request. And they didn't specify a font fallback, only their external web font. It would have worked if they had added monospace as a fallback.
Not my blog, just sharing it here. That said, I don't see that broken rectangle on Chromium.In my Firefox I get a NS_BINDING_ABORTED error on the Google Fonts font request. And they didn't specify a font fallback, only their external web font. It would have worked if they had added monospace as a fallback.
In my Firefox I get a NS_BINDING_ABORTED error on the Google Fonts font request. And they didn't specify a font fallback, only their external web font. It would have worked if they had added monospace as a fallback.
The "rectangle" probably isn't supposed to be this messy?
Not my blog, just sharing it here.
That said, I don't see that broken rectangle on Chromium.
In my Firefox I get a
NS_BINDING_ABORTEDerror on the Google Fonts font request.And they didn't specify a font fallback, only their external web font. It would have worked if they had added
monospaceas a fallback.Seems like a valid formalization.
I think a or a few counter-examples would go a long way though.