Self Hosting Noob, Freenas vs Ubuntu Server with Samba

MrKilroy@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.world – 23 points –

Hi Everyone,

So, I am very new to self-hosting. A couple of years ago I set up a mini PC running Ubuntu Server with Nextcloud and Jellyfin on my network. Now I think I want to move away from Nextcloud as for me, uploading files to it hasn't been super reliable and it has been a little slow. It also seems to have a lot of features I really don't need.

At the moment, I basically use my server just for file storage, plus running Jellyfin. I think initially I went to nextcloud because I wanted a solution that would automatically sync my files to my network storage kinda like onedrive. However, Nextcloud on different systems doesn't work the same way and I basically ended up just manually copying everything over to Nextcloud and using it like a network drive. At that point, why even use nextcloud then? I would be better off with Sharing a folder using Samba right? Do you think that would be the best fit for my needs? Or should I learn about freenas? Taking a quick look at it I'm not sure what advantages it would have over just a samba share.

Edit: Thanks everyone! You've given me a lot to look into!

5

I'm not familiar with FreeNAS, but I see it's advantages mostly in it's gui and zfs support. So if you just need a few smb shares and don't need to constantly configure it, I'd go with Ubuntu.

If you have multiple disks that you can use in raid, then zfs might be a good idea for it's check summing capabilities and correction of bitrot.

But it's also possible to install zfs on Ubuntu, though you'd have to use the cli instead of FreeNAS gui. I've recently setup a zfs raid 1 for the first time and the cli is simple to understand and the docs are great.

So I'd stay with Ubuntu and just use samba directly.

I use syncthing to collect my data from several devices (smartphones and PC) to my server at home, when I am in my home network.

Then, on the server, rclone takes over with various daily/weekly tasks and syncs the stuff to my cloud storage. Some encrypted some plain. From my mobile or my pc I have access to all the data either at home or via vpn as well as directly to the cloud backup.

imo truenas because it’s made for storage. It will monitor your drives, it’s easy to expand storage. Want nextcloud? It’s a plugin ready to install. Want plex media server? Just add the plugin. Need backups of your machines? Try the backuppc plugin.

Core is based on frebsd, while scale is Debian. While scale is fun I’m still a core-fan.
Samba on a Debian box works as well if all you want is smb. But it’s a you made it you support it solution. On Truenas there’s loads of people making sure it’s secure and working and updating is a button.

Well, personally I prefer the one with Enforcing Selinux by default.🐘