If you want people to help you, it would be good if you weren't so condescending...
Edit: Grammar.
Arch Linux
Great Wiki
It just works comparing to other distros like Ubuntu
My home PC for programming, I just love it
I’m not a heavy gamer but games are much better on Arch Linux, including Steam Deck
.
endeavourOS
arch + installer + an awesome community
spiral linux
debian + btrfs + snapper with snapshots in grub
I run it with sid and the snapshots are great if anything goes wrong with an upgrade
Everybody else has figured it out, that's not how it's done.
Frankly, you're being obnoxious.
Zorin OS
It is a very clean and neat Linux distro.
Fedora
Better defaults than Ubuntu
Stable enough for production servers
I have many self hosted apps and containers and I have only a few issues time to time which is easily fixable
Arch
It's lightweight and efficient
Arch is also not more lightweight than other distributions.
With Arch, unlike other distributions, there are no extra dev packages. Thus, everything is present in a single package, so they require more storage space.
Arch's packages also have fixed dependencies on other packages, which in turn have other dependencies. So you can't only install what you actually want, which is often claimed. For example, I would like to uninstall various Bluetooth packages, but I can't because they are dependencies for packages I use.
The basic installation including base-devel requires more than 1 GB of storage space without the GUI. Some distributions need less including the GUI.
There are indeed more lightweight distros. But if you want something that "works out of the box", contrary to, say, PuppyLinux or Gentoo, then Arch is interesting.
It is however harder to configure than Fedora, Manjaro, SuSE, etc. It's a great inbetween.
Arch Linux
It offers choice for advanced users and developers.
More up to date software (mostly).
Debian
It’s just stable and fast
My 2 servers are running on debian for years without any single issue
Linux Mint Cinnamon Edition
.
incapable of instructing.
you're running around insulting people for doing exactly what you asked in exactly the format you provided
Personally, I currently prefer Arch for the following reasons.
If I had to choose another distribution, it would definitely be OpenSuse. Their rolling version, Tumbleweed, is also highly recommended.
Debian and FreeBSD
Sometimes, I feel sick of such simplistic questions. They look like they're just for triggering people to response.
Alpine Linux Hyperbola OpenBSD
Last is not linux based though.
.
If you want people to help you, it would be good if you weren't so condescending...
Edit: Grammar.
Arch Linux
.
endeavourOS
arch + installer + an awesome community
spiral linux
Everybody else has figured it out, that's not how it's done.
Frankly, you're being obnoxious.
Zorin OS
It is a very clean and neat Linux distro.
Fedora
Arch
It's lightweight and efficient
Arch is also not more lightweight than other distributions.
With Arch, unlike other distributions, there are no extra dev packages. Thus, everything is present in a single package, so they require more storage space.
Arch's packages also have fixed dependencies on other packages, which in turn have other dependencies. So you can't only install what you actually want, which is often claimed. For example, I would like to uninstall various Bluetooth packages, but I can't because they are dependencies for packages I use.
The basic installation including base-devel requires more than 1 GB of storage space without the GUI. Some distributions need less including the GUI.
There are indeed more lightweight distros. But if you want something that "works out of the box", contrary to, say, PuppyLinux or Gentoo, then Arch is interesting.
It is however harder to configure than Fedora, Manjaro, SuSE, etc. It's a great inbetween.
Arch Linux
It offers choice for advanced users and developers.
More up to date software (mostly).
Debian
Manjaro
https://manjarno.snorlax.sh/
I don't need to manually install anything thanks to the AUR being the most extensive package repository I know about.
You should carefully review anything you install from AUR. No review happens there at all. Everyone can upload anything he likes.
Yes, and PKGBUILD files with bad intentions have been published there in the past (https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2018-July/034151.html).
But both Manjaro (https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository) and vanilla Arch (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository) point out the possible dangers clearly enough in my opinion. Apart from that, it is definitely easier for users to check for example the PKBUILD files in the AUR than ready-made packages in a PPA for Ubuntu.