Since the convo states 2017 as the date, I assume OP is not the source and/or the issue is not acute anymore.

With the first rise of online casinos (pre 2010), a friend of mine thought he had rigged the system by more or less the same strategy. I think the usual approach is actually to double the bet.

Well..in the end he won a debt of several 10k€ before he had to quit. This put a huge strain on his early adulthood.

How does an obvious slip of the tongue qualify as news? In a short Youtube clip without any journalistic effort even?

Downvoted for that reason.

That's actually just a basic skill in Germany and far from impressive. Even myself who basically can do nothing with his hands can open a beer bottle with many objects that have an edge.

Not saying that it might not be impressive in other parts of the world, but dont overestimate its effect in Germany. ;)

Edit: Just remembered that I knew a guy who opened bottles with his eye socket...crazy shit.

Good article with the worst title when most ppl only read the headlines

It actually debunks the fake news spread probably by Russia and naturally further spread by Republican politicians.

Nobody denies anything. It's simply not on the same level of bullshit that Trump spread. Not even remotely.

The bones in your upper legs are one of those (together with your hips) that have a persisting high bone marrow density, which produces a high amount of white blood cells during infection. This means that the bone marrow is populated by a much higher number of cells, which creates "pressure".

Erm, sorry, but I fail to see the news here? It's a nice information about neuschwanstein, but what exactly happened now?

Yep, it doesnt excuse him automatically, you are right. Let's judge him for a saying tje vaccine protects more than it did - sorry again, why is this not an exaggeration? - while we judge Trump for willfullingly lie about treatments, seriosity of the disease and precautions that is estimated to have caused a fuckton of additional deaths. Let's see...Biden's exaggeration caused...0 deaths.

So, comparing a pebble to a boulder. See the issue?

Do we really want to spread Breitbart links?

Maybe post this in an AMA equivalent community? You missed the point of "asking Lemmy" utterly and have it the wrong way.

Personally, I still wouldnt be interested.

https://piped.video/watch?v=2dKdBlKgquw

Here's the clip to that iconic action.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Reiner_(businessman)

More a local celebrity in his birth place than like real a class celeb. Howevery, he's the reason why I got to sign the golden book of my home town when I was 10something. I still wish I had a good Signature back then and not just plain (and ugly) cursive.

Shopping, especially when walking to the supermarket.

Going for a walk in general, actually.

All I’m seeing here is that because Trump exists, Biden is automatically innocent of any wrongdoing. This binary view of politics is the real problem with this country.

That's only because you actively close your eyes on everything other commentators say. Again, just for you;

Nobody is denying that Biden exaggerated.

It's just completely and utterly negligent. Of course we know now that vaccination does not "prevent" all spreading. Still, here is one of many reviews underlining the effectivity of vaccines. While this is not a complete prevention, it's just pedantic and catching straws to find wrongdoings on both sides. Please refrain from spreading misinformation in regards of the effects of the vaccine. So - the 2nd time I ask, maybe you'll answer now: How is that NOT an exaggeration?

You simply cannot compare Trumps STRATEGY that caused 40% more deaths than necessary to one claim that was even backed by the CDC at the time. Fearing it might be not so easy to understand: Thats how science works...you work with theories that change over time.

I don't feel like anyone could use your argumentation other than in bad faith. If you don't please consider again if "both sides are the same", if one side told something untrue, while the other murdered your family - talking abstractly now.

What? Of course the newly exposed skin will be more sensitive as compared to before...for some time. We are talking about years and probably at least a decade after the circumcision took place, until it gets relevant for the affected person for sexual reasons. Until then the (probably even higher than before) sensitivity will have dropped. Sensors in the skin will be cut down by the body in order to prevent irritations when they have to fire all the time, which is true for the glans that is not protected anymore, is irritated all the time (underwear) and does not have the same capability to produce callus as the hands or feet.

The principle should not be foreign to you as principally the same happens by producing callus. The body produces it to stop irritation and to prevent long-lasting negative effects.

I really have trouble comprehending your comment. Do you mean that any criticism is unjustified?