Is "Sexual Anarchy" supposed to be a bad thing? Because that's sounds pretty fucking awesome to me.
Is "Sexual Anarchy" supposed to be a bad thing? Because that's sounds pretty fucking awesome to me.
Good. If I downvote something its for a reason, and I don't care who knows.
I'm certain this is absolutely hilarious in robot, you're just too fleshy and inefficient to understand.
I'm not an ant, so it's not really scary at all to me.
You came to the wrong fucking place then.
Honestly, they all seemed insufferable. Just pure toxic positivity. Im glad they're gone.
Life is too short to argue with idiots. Ignore them let them wallow in their stupidity.
Ok
Did it not happen in the world?
No, most people really don't care.
A third party in the US would just replace one of the 2 existing parties so within one or two election cycles we'd be back to two anyway. And with the way the parties are acting currently it would probably be the Republican party to collapse and be replaced.
All the negative traits you list are my favorite things about cats! I love their independence and fuck you attitude.
They can ask, and I can tell them to fuck right off. Simple.
I am so confused by this question because because why wouldn't two people who are equal contribute as equals? Are people in relationships where one person contributes everything and the other person just coasts? And if so, why would you do that to yourself?
I'd like to see them make me. Fuck them and their "rule"
Why would they not want to be replaced? Is there a point to stay under the new rules? I see no value in staying on reddit.
You came to the wrong fucking place then.
Of course not, that's silly.
They are, that's just the truth.
Forrest Gump is for Boomers what Ready Player One was for Gen X. And I'm sure they'll be something for Millennials soon. Just Nostalgia for the sake of Nostalgia barely laced together with a plot.
Why in the fuck would you even want to do something like that?
No it fucking wasn't. And if it was where you are, then you're surrounded by racists.
Those are the same thing.
Honestly, if it isn't "offensive to public order and morals" I'm not that interested.
From the weed store
Cigarettes are banned in the Federal prison system, and most other state prisons as far as I'm aware.
I have three younger siblings. Our relationship is basically that of acquaintances.
No shit.
Because people like dogs. And like to pet them, even virtually.
And those semantics are very important to people and ridiculously easy to do right, so why do it wrong on purpose unless you are deliberately an asshole?
I won't be forced to do shit. I dont want to communicate with their users.
Who would have thought that a guy who's entire career was based on hanging out at the beach drunk would die of skin cancer. It's so unexpected...
Honestly, yes. It does remind me of those days. Reminds me of the old Usenet.
I despised cooked fish, I refuse to eat cooked fish, but sushi? Delicious.
And that matters?
I dislike other people and would prefer to not interact with them if I don't have to.
Which one?
I don't hate music, I also don't like music. I am indifferent to music. I don't seek it out at all, nor do I ever listen to it on my own.
Being prepared is not panicking.
I signed up for Lemmy.world, because not having downvotes is stupid and leads to a shitty community.